Saturday, February 6, 2010

Good Military Boardgames Why Do People Think Russia Has A Good Military?

Why do people think Russia has a good military? - good military boardgames

People (even people in the U.S.) think that Russia is a strong army. Much of it comes in a number of people in my opinion, and that is why China is an army well. Russia has more than 141 million people, while the United States has about 330 million people, and we have better weapons and more technologically advanced than Russia. So why do people believe that Russia (a good soldier, but also fears of Russia an unbiased point of view)? Is it because they also have nuclear weapons?

15 comments:

Antswer said...

From personal experience living and working conditions with the Russians in Bosnia and Kosovo, I can say that they are largely ineffective, except in cases of organized crime and banditry. This is a recruitment, non-commissioned officers corps of the weak and corrupt officers. They live very dirty, fraud and theft by the locals to their places of use and participate in black market and smuggling. Please note that my impressions were formed by the interaction with one of the Airborne Brigade, allegedly, an elite unit.

As his team worked hard with light weapons and vehicles, and I'm not impressed. I visited the former Soviet Union and Soviet military bases for the block many of Germany and Eastern Europe, the Baltic States and the Assemblies in Eastern Azerbaijan. The construction was of poor quality. The country remains largely incapable of a credible force by sea, land or air project.

The Russian military was and is the organization of the Third World, personnel, equipment, tactics and thinking. It is not likely to change quickly - is a mirror image of RussiaGeneral. Country Study, ambition and reality and their own opinion. A fight on Russian soil would be a brutal war of attrition, such as Nazi Germany against the Eastern Front in World War II. I'm sure it would be good to work beyond their own borders, without solid support and mechanisms.

Good luck!

fligby3 said...

Since Russia does not spend too much money for military purposes from, and we have our best weapon in the world. I've heard that they (more than 200 million U.S. dollars for its military might in the future to spend 2012-2015) and also T-95 tanks work in progress that the best will in the world, how can it even helicopters (more on T -95: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-95) + have the best aircraft in the world Su-47 (referred to as the Su-47: http:/ / en.wikipedia.org / wiki / Sukhoi_Su -47) and have a lot of powerful new technology.

You can see some "modern" Russian military photos here if interested:
http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?t=99988

I love yanking your chain said...

By their enormous destructive power, nuclear bombs as a political instrument of war at this time. Sustainability of the Soviet legacy, Russia remains the leader of the size of the arsenal of nuclear warheads and delivery capabilities. United States comes at a follow right behind, away from the People's Republic of China. Although this share close business relationships with other triad, regarded as military rivals, mainly because of their political orientation and spheres of influence.

Within the Storm said...

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation (UTC) (Russian: Вооружённые Силы Российской Федерации, transliteration: is Rossíyskoj Sily Voruzhonnije Federatsii) the subordination of the military Department of Defense of the Russian Federation, following the implosion of the Soviet Union. On 7 May 1992 Boris Yeltsin signed a decree establishing the Russian Ministry of Defense and for all the troops of the Soviet armed forces on the territory of the RSFSR under the control of the Russian Federation. The commander of the armed forces is the President of the Russian Federation now (Dmitry Medvedev).

The Russian Army (Russian Сухопутные войска Российской Федерации, tr: Suhopútnyje Vojsko Rossiiskoi Federatsii) is the land forces of Russia, parts of the army in the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1992 formed. This raises many economic challenges as well as reforms to professionalize the force during the transition phase, that Russia had to endure because of the collapse of the Soviet Union. DuringRussian ground forces in their current form are only 15 years to the Russian authorities, the history of their origin "track in the Russian Empire at the time of Kievan Rus. Since 1992, the Army, thousands of troops from former Soviet garrisons had to retire abroad, while fully into the war in Chechnya and peacekeeping operations and other measures to ensure their responsibilities post-(Soviet states in Russia, which is known as its "near abroad). Only recently clashed with Georgian forces in August 2008.

Joe Z said...

It does not matter, Russia can lower the number of people in the United States and China, but what will the next war, not in a war that will have a nuclear war. Even if you have a war, Russia and China are far more people in the U.S. Army have. Russian men in the armed forces are much stronger physically and mentally and the United States. Of course I'm not every single soldier.

Micah L said...

I did not know people thought that the Russian army is so good. I know that was in the 80s, the Soviet army in our comparable in terms of technology, then came the unfortunate fall and financial problems of the 90s. I do not think that the Russian army will never be as good as ours, (we'll wait and see what Obama) to our military, but I believe that the recovery technique does.

Smudgewa... said...

Since there are no limits to what its leaders are willing to pay a total war, 20 million deaths in the 2nd To make war, compared to a few hundreds of thousands of American soldiers who came to Hollywood in the late W.. Technically they were very poor indeed lost 5 men for every 1 of the Germans, far more effective.
The limits of democratic life in Vietnam by the United States, about half of the 100,000 have lost because of nerve Vietnamese were willing to lose all his troops, millions of people.

Brandon said...

The T-90 is as good as ours in September M1A2
Your CPA is not as good as the Bradley, or LAV-25
They are motorized and the United States ... Essentially all mechanized divisions

Russian navy is now nothing but rubble and crumbling

Su-34 is good, but Russia is for our F-15 and F-16 as compared to more than 30 years. Su Su-34 is compared with the F-22, where she waxed.

His alligator is nothing for our Apache Longbow in comparison ... The female is out of date ..

Russia - USA
T-90 = M1A2
BMD-3 \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ u0026lt; M2A3
BMP-3 \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ u0026lt; LAV-25
Marina \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ u0026lt; Marina
Su-34 \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ u0026lt, F-22
SU-34> F-15
SU-30 \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ u0026lt, F-15
KA-52 Alligator \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ u0026lt, AH-64 Apache
Mobility mobility =

John said...

because it is not. Russia is a major arms manufacturer and has a large population, so it (I think) the 4th strongest army in the world. also the largest nuclear arsenal of a second, making it stronger.

BTW, and someone has to clean pro-Bush era.

obamasbr... said...

Man, I would put it in perspective.russia can drive across Europe in 2 days .. Get the picture.yep was the United States, our forces began to King Obama blank ....... Yes, we still have Putin, to the complete gutting Messiah.

◘ màttý ◘ said...

Nukes 1)
Propaganda 2)
3) Size
4) population
5) Past

All points of view might not have the potential of people who know just what they are talking.

◘ màttý ◘ said...

Nukes 1)
Propaganda 2)
3) Size
4) population
5) Past

All points of view might not have the potential of people who know just what they are talking.

Anonymous said...

I think it is still a remnant of the paranoia of the 1980s ... The Russian bear is strong, he can crush us, if you are after a second ...

yes ... would probably be the fight ... they could do certain things, but do not believe the danger that many seem to, they are ...

veritas said...

They have more men and women prepared food for the military ... like Israel has no choice but to participate.
Most of the budget goes to the army, both of nuclear weapons .. same way as the United States

Mater said...

Can help weather.

Post a Comment